Speed Race Benelli and QJ Compete in the International Motorbike Arena - Free Essay Example

What are the fundamental cultural differences that may impede success after the acquisition? The acquisition will result in the Russian company being dismantled, and the machinery that they own will be transferred to the United Kingdom, and they will not only lose the brand but also the job that they have now. Education is the fundamental cultural difference that might interfere with the success of an organization or a person after the acquisition. There is a difference that lies in between an employer who equates the employees with the success and their credentials. There is a difference between an employee who has college skills and one that has the practical knowledge and experiences.   There is the cultural difference which is the personal background of a person. The place where a person lives will determine a lot the cultural differences in the workplace and the relationship that will be built in between the other colleagues. This, for instance, comes in when communicating, language barriers or the manner in which the business is being conducted. What are the key problems related to cultural differences and which integration approach should the company follow to overcome these challenges? Various challenges may arise due to cultural differences. For one, there is confrontation vs. consensus building. A person is likely to be affected by their background when it comes to the styles of communicating. A person is being confronted by their background.   There is the problem of religion and the workplace.   Religion is a major issue that can come and become an issue in the workplace. People have a different kind of worship, and this might be a risk for there are those people that dislike or are against certain other religions.   For the leader to solve all the cultural barriers then they must be in a position to learn their clients culture, promote appreciation of cultural differences and lastly they should be open when it comes to trying new things.

Pakistan, India and the Second Kashmir War

In 1965, India and Pakistan fought their second of three major wars since 1947 over Kashmir. The United States was largely to blame for setting the stage for war. The United States in the 1960s was an arms supplier to both India and Pakistan--under the condition that neither side would use the weapons to fight each other. The weapons were ostensibly designed to counter communist Chinas influence in the region. The condition, imposed by the Kennedy and Johnson administrations, was a naive reflection of American misunderstandings that would plague American policy there for decades. Had the United States not supplied either sides with tanks and jets, fighting would likely not have resulted, as Pakistan would not have had the air power to take on the Indian military, which was eight times the size of Pakistans. (India had 867,000 men under arms at the time, Pakistan just 101,000). Pakistan, however, allied itself in 1954 with the United States through the Southeast Asia Treaty Organization, leading neutralist India to accuse Pakistan of positioning itself for an American-backed attack. U.S. arms supplies in the 1960s fed the fears. We warned our friends that this aid would not be used against China, but against Pakistan, Pakistani President Ayub Khan, who ruled Pakistan from 1958 to 1969, complained in September 1965 of American arms flowing to India, too. Ayud, of course, was being brazenly hypocritical as he had also dispatched American-made fighter jets against Indian forces in Kashmir. The second war over Kashmir, never declared, broke out on Aug. 15, 1965 and lasted until a UN-brokered cease-fire on Sept. 22. The war was inconclusive, costing the two sides a combined 7,000 casualties but gaining them little. According to the U.S. Library of Congress Country Studies on Pakistan, Each side held prisoners and some territory belonging to the other. Losses were relatively heavy--on the Pakistani side, twenty aircraft, 200 tanks, and 3,800 troops. Pakistans army had been able to withstand Indian pressure, but a continuation of the fighting would only have led to further losses and ultimate defeat for Pakistan. Most Pakistanis, schooled in the belief of their own martial prowess, refused to accept the possibility of their countrys military defeat by Hindu India and were, instead, quick to blame their failure to attain their military aims on what they considered to be the ineptitude of Ayub Khan and his government. India and Pakistan agreed to a cease-fire on Sept. 22, though not without Pakistans Zulikfar Ali Bhutto, the foreign minister at the time, threatening that Pakistan would leave the United Nations if the Kashmir situation wasnt settled. His ultimatum carried no timetable. Bhutto called India a great monster, a great aggressor. The cease-fire was not substantial beyond a demand that both sides put down their arms and a pledge to send international observers to Kashmir. Pakistan renewed its call for a referendum by Kashmirs mostly Muslim population of 5 million to decide the regions future, in accordance with a 1949 UN resolution. India continued to resist conducting such a plebiscite. The 1965 war, in sum, settled nothing and merely put off future conflicts.

Atomic Bomb Dbq - 949 Words

APUSH DBQ As World War II was coming to an end during 1945, the creation of one of the most destructive weapons known to humanity occurred within the United States. This weapon, known as â€Å"the atomic bomb,† was used on the two Japanese cities: Hiroshima and Nagasaki, resulting in a death toll unprecedented by any military weapon used before and an immediate, unconditional surrender. Some historians believe President Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb in order to intimidate the Soviet Union whereas others believe it was a strictly military measure designed to force Japan’s unconditional surrender. In the Report of a Scientific Panel of nuclear physicists, some scientific colleagues believed the atomic bomb was a â€Å"purely technical†¦show more content†¦(Doc C). Next, Winston Churchill’s recollection of the Potsdam Conference also emphasized the need to end the war before Soviet intervention. It seemed to be a mutual agreement between the U.S. and Britain that the two powers should not need the Red Army to end the war with Japan (Doc E). Finally, nuclear physicist Leo Szilard’s recollection of a 1945 meeting between James Byrnes and a group of concerned atomic scientists supports the idea that America dropped the atomic bomb to intimidate the U.S.S.R. The scientists were very concerned about the rapid spreading of Russian influence in Europe, which probably contributed to the U.S. policy of containment. Due to this fear, James Byrnes and the atomic scientists believed that demonstrating the bomb would make the Soviet Union more manageable in Europe. One can also argue that this approach can be related the John Foster Dulles theory of massive retaliation, which is the belief that the threat of â€Å"massive of retaliation† with nuclear weapons would stop Soviet aggression. Therefore, one can argue that the dropping of the atomic bomb was a diplomatic measure calculated to intimidate the Soviet Union and on e can argue that this idea was backed by the theories of containment and massive retaliation. Essentially, the theory behind the dropping atomic bomb on Hiroshima was dichotomous; some argue that it was to induce prompt and unconditional surrender by Japan, while others argue that it was to threaten the Soviet Union.Show MoreRelatedAtomic Bomb Justified? Essay1643 Words   |  7 PagesWas the Atomic Bombing Justified? The Atomic Bomb made a very serious statement at a time when the world was in disarray (â€Å"Manhattan†). World War II was one of the most destructive times in history causing over 50 million deaths and leaving behind mental and physical casualties of war. (â€Å"World War II†) It started in September, 1939 when Germany invaded Poland and continued on a destructive path through Europe. Britain and France declared war on Germany. Two years prior in 1937, the Sino JapaneseRead MoreApush Dbqs Essay2248 Words   |  9 Pages2011 DBQ: (Form A) 1. Analyze the international and domestic challenges the United States faced between 1968 and 1974, and evaluate how President Richard Nixon’s administration responded to them. (Form B) 1. Explain the ways that participation in political campaigns and elections in the United States changed between 1815 and 1840, and analyze forces and events that led to these changes. 2010 DBQ: (Form A) 1. In what ways did ideas and values held by Puritans influence the politicalRead MoreThe Cold War On The United States Domestic Policy1940 Words   |  8 Pagespossibly knew and could. Later, through science, we have learned that many of their tactics when it came to protecting themselves would not even have worked.The United States spend a lot of extra money during this time period to keep up with the war. (DBQ questions) During the Cold War, America as a whole was terrified of the idea of communists. Everybody had a perception of a communist, and knew that they did not like them. The American Government took many measures to protect the United States fromRead MoreEssay on Tension and Suspicion Between U.S. and Russia1310 Words   |  6 PagesName Teacher AP U.S. History October 8, 2012 DBQ From the years of 1941 to 1949, there was an increase in suspicion and tension between the United States and the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was a Communist country ruled by a dictator while America was a capitalist democracy that valued freedom. Their completely different beliefs and aims caused friction to form between them, which contributed to the creation of the Cold War. At the start of the first world war, Germany and the Soviet Union

Dorm Life Essay Research Paper Dorm Life free essay sample

Dorm Life Essay, Research Paper Dorm Life Dorm life at Bowling Green State University is like most other colleges. Students that live in the residence halls are known to go really close, frequently walking to sort together, playing athleticss, and remaining up tardily for all dark survey Sessionss. The pupils that live in the residence halls are in some sense, a society. Every individual has a duty. Sometimes, if any one individual does non finish what they are responsible for, the whole society has to pay. There can be many jobs in a residence hall. Students playing music excessively loud in their suites after quiet hours, and non esteeming others are illustrations of jobs that merely affect one or two people. Problems like go forthing the hall a muss and go forthing rubbish in the bathroom are jobs that affect the whole residence hall. By go forthing rubbish in the hallway or in the bathrooms, the pupil runs the hazard of being fined from the tutelary services for holding to take out the room rubbish. We will write a custom essay sample on Dorm Life Essay Research Paper Dorm Life or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page These mulcts are highly rough. At one point, a floor would be fined $ 11 for a tutelary worker to hold to pick up a pizza box. Other jobs include home bases, silverware, and trays from the dining hall weaving up in the hallway, go forthing the bathroom a muss, and purging. The whole floor is charged with this all right if the existent perpetrator International Relations and Security Network T found. Durham 2 Dorm policy is to ticket the pupils on the floor that the incident occurred on. These mulcts can go rather inordinate, sometimes transcending $ 500 per semester. A pupil can non have his or her concluding classs for the twelvemonth unless these mulcts are paid in whole. This brings up the inquiry, Is it right for all the pupils on the floor to be fined if merely one or a few of the occupants went against the regulations? Should a few bad apples ruin the whole clump? I think non. I feel that person should turn to the job by keeping monthly, if non hebdomadal meetings to inform th e pupils that they need to take their rubbish out alternatively of puting it in the bathroom. Students need to be told that trays and all other silverware and home bases need to be returned to the dining hall. Repeat is the key. If the solution is pounded and pounded into the pupil s caputs, so they will get down to obey. A hall manager could besides maintain the pupils believing by reminding them how much the floor owes, and what their portion is. Changeless reminders will discourage the pupils from interrupting the regulations. Another, the thought of Terri Capellman, alumnus hall manager of Compton Hall in the Kreischer Quad at BGSU, is to put in cameras to catch the lawbreakers in the act. The sight of a camera watching the hallway would be plenty to forestall rubbish being left in the hallway, possible Acts of the Apostless of hooliganism and larceny. Either of these two possible solutions would work, but have we confronted the existent inquiry? Who should pay for all the harm that occurs in the abode halls? If there is an exigency after the hr of 12 a.m. to 8 a.m. on a Thursday, Friday, Saturday, or Sunday dark, so an Emergency Maintenance keeper has to come and Durham 3 fix the job. This individual is of class paid for their overtime. An exigency care keeper can be called in at any clip of the dark. If an exigency care keeper is needed, so they are paid for 4 hours of regular clip, no affair how long they stay at that place. The starting pay for a full clip keeper is $ 9.93/hour. ( Payroll Office Stat istic ) This means that the keeper was paid at least $ 39.72 to come in and clean up something that could hold taken 10 proceedingss to clean up such as broken glass. The pupils on the violating floor are charged for this wage. The keepers may state that the rewards they are given for coming in at unacceptable hours of the dark are legit. They seem utmost to me. I think that the keepers should of class be paid excess for coming in at such late hours, but possibly non every bit much as is said. A sensible pay for an exigency care keeper is $ 30. Keep in head that the $ 9.93 is a starting pay, and since we are at a province funded university, those rewards get raised in no clip. A good wage for an exigency care keeper would be $ 19.86/hour. This is dual what they make during the twenty-four hours and there is no extra cost for clip that is non spent on working. A solution to the whole exigency care trade is to hold one of the dark guards or an on responsibility occupant adviser clean u p the muss. There are ever three dark guards on responsibility from the hours of 12 a.m. to 4 a.m. The occupation of these people is to look into in occupants coming in after the hr of midnight. Does the forepart desk truly necessitate 3 people making the work of two? Durham 4 An on responsibility RA that has nil to make could besides be a possible solution for the killing. On most darks the on responsibility RA has nil to make, but they are being paid for making it. Put them to work. Trash and trays left in the hallway are non the lone things that a custodian might hold to clean up. As you may cognize, imbibing is rather common among college pupils. If a occupant were to vomit due to the ingestion of excessively much intoxicant after the hr of 12 a.m. so one time once more the exigency care keeper would hold to be called one time once more. All of these misdemeanors do non do hall managers happy. They are the 1s that control the budgets of the abode halls. If excessively much money is being spent in one country of the residence hall, so the pupils have to pay. If there is a ailment of rubbish or trays in one of the bathrooms, so the pupils have to pay. Why should all the occupants have to pay for something that one individual did? Harmonizing to the BGSU pupil enchiridion, the policy is this manner because the pupils are the 1s that know who is perpetrating all these misdemeanors. When the pupils see others perpetrating a misdemeanor of the regulations, they should take action by stating the individual courteously that the mulct for what he or she is making will be assessed to the whole floor. If the lawbreaker is outnumbered, he or she might experience pressured to obey the wants of his or her equals. In decision, it should be shown that the single pupil should non be fined for something that one of their equals did. I have given a few solutions of how to cut costs for the abode halls so the pupils do non hold to be fined as much. I understand that person ha s to pay for the harm that is made but I besides think that it should be the individual or individuals that commit the offense. I am a college pupil and my floor has already accumulated good over $ 2000 dollars so far this school twelvemonth. I feel that it is non just that I have to pay for something that I didn t do. Start tins, Styrofoam cups and trays make the residence hall expression like a junkyard. The ultimate thing that needs to go on is the pupils need to take duty for their ain actions. 31a